Wired: Battle of the New Atheism
There's good evidence from research by anthropologists such as Pascal Boyer and Scott Atran that a grab bag of cognitive predispositions makes us natural believers. We hear leaves rustle and we imagine that some airy being flutters up there; we see a corpse and continue to fear the judgment and influence of the person it once was. Remarkable progress has been made in understanding why faith is congenial to human nature -- and of course that still says nothing about whether it is true. Harris is typically severe in his rejection of the idea that evolutionary history somehow justifies faith. There is, he writes, "nothing more natural than rape. But no one would argue that rape is good, or compatible with a civil society, because it may have had evolutionary advantages for our ancestors." Like rape, Harris says, religion may be a vestige of our primitive nature that we must simply overcome.
Richard Dawkins: Why There Almost Certainly Is No God
If you set out in a spaceship to find the one planet in the galaxy that has life, the odds against your finding it would be so great that the task would be indistinguishable, in practice, from impossible. But if you are alive (as you manifestly are if you are about to step into a spaceship) you needn't bother to go looking for that one planet because, by definition, you are already standing on it. The anthropic principle really is rather elegant. By the way, I don't actually think the origin of life was as improbable as all that. I think the galaxy has plenty of islands of life dotted about, even if the islands are too spaced out for any one to hope for a meeting with any other. My point is only that, given the number of planets in the universe, the origin of life could in theory be as lucky as a blindfolded golfer scoring a hole in one. The beauty of the anthropic principle is that, even in the teeth of such stupefying odds against, it still gives us a perfectly satisfying explanation for life's presence on our own planet.
Ja sitten luodaan joko oksymoroni tai hybridimutantti: Christian Atheism
Let's put the future behind us
We've arrived in a different future, and central planning doesn't work. Things are fast, chaotic, cheap, and out of control. Ad hoc is the new plan. There's a new cultural strange attractor at work, sucking in the young, smart, deracinated mechanistically-minded readers who used to be the natural prey of the SF movement. It's geek culture. You can find it in the pages of Wired (although it's a pale shadow of what it used to be) and on Boing!Boing! and Slashdot. You can find them playing MMORPGs and hacking their game consoles. These people have different interests from the old generation of SF readers. And unfortunately they don't buy many [fiction] books, because we aren't, for the most part, writing for them.
"Like rape, Harris says, religion may be a vestige of our primitive nature that we must simply overcome."
Tähän tarvitaan selkeästi jokin wiki-tyyppinen palvelu jossa voi ilmoittaa havaitsemansa ihmisluonnon primitiiviset, nykymaailmaan sopimattomat ominaisuudet. Sitten voitaisiin yhteisön voimin miettiä mistä mikin johtuu ja mitä asialle voisi tehdä.
Posted by: Alari at October 25, 2006 10:27 AMTarjouduitko juuri vapaaehtoiseksi tekemään sellaista? :)
Näistä voi lähteä liikkeelle:
http://changingminds.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_adaptation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases